AIDS issues and support

Evidence for co-factors/"rethinking"

"IV Drug Use Compromises Integrity of Cell Membranes Prior to HIV
Infection"
Reuters (02/14/96)
     Researchers in Switzerland have reported that intravenous drug
use "compromises the biochemical and structural integrity of the
membrane surface" of blood cells even before HIV infection.  The
researchers studied the blood cells of 101 injection drug users,
including 91 who were HIV-positive, as well as the blood of a
control group HIV-negative IV drug users.  The scientists found
that both groups had abnormal surface enzyme kinetics in their
peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Comments (6)




6 Responses to “Evidence for co-factors/"rethinking"”

  1. admin says:

    In <4g5d9l$…@maureen.teleport.com> BKLBKL…@aol.com (BKL) writes:

    >"IV Drug Use Compromises Integrity of Cell Membranes Prior to HIV
    >Infection"
    >Reuters (02/14/96)
    >     Researchers in Switzerland have reported that intravenous drug
    >use "compromises the biochemical and structural integrity of the
    >membrane surface" of blood cells even before HIV infection.  The
    >researchers studied the blood cells of 101 injection drug users,
    >including 91 who were HIV-positive, as well as the blood of a
    >control group HIV-negative IV drug users.  The scientists found
    >that both groups had abnormal surface enzyme kinetics in their
    >peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

      There is epidemiologic evidence that IV drug use (though not other
    kinds of drug use) is a cofactor for development of AIDS in HIV
    positive people.  There is no evidence that HIV-negative people are
    immunocompromised in an AIDS-type fashion by IV drug use, and
    considerable evidence against the notion.

                                              Steve Harris, M.D.

  2. admin says:

    Steven B. Harris/Virginia George wrote:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    > In <4g5d9l$…@maureen.teleport.com> BKLBKL…@aol.com (BKL) writes:

    > >"IV Drug Use Compromises Integrity of Cell Membranes Prior to HIV
    > >Infection"
    > >Reuters (02/14/96)
    > >     Researchers in Switzerland have reported that intravenous drug
    > >use "compromises the biochemical and structural integrity of the
    > >membrane surface" of blood cells even before HIV infection.  The
    > >researchers studied the blood cells of 101 injection drug users,
    > >including 91 who were HIV-positive, as well as the blood of a
    > >control group HIV-negative IV drug users.  The scientists found
    > >that both groups had abnormal surface enzyme kinetics in their
    > >peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

    >   There is epidemiologic evidence that IV drug use (though not other
    > kinds of drug use) is a cofactor for development of AIDS in HIV
    > positive people.  There is no evidence that HIV-negative people are
    > immunocompromised in an AIDS-type fashion by IV drug use, and
    > considerable evidence against the notion.

    >                                           Steve Harris, M.D.

    Steve,

    I’d be curious to know more about studies that suggest that injection
    drug use speeds disease progression in HIV+ folks.

    Most of the literature I have read suggests otherwise.  See, for example

    Galli M et ak.  No evidence for a role of continuous intravenous drug
    injection in accelerating disease progression in HIV-1 positive subjects.
    IntConf AIDS; 7(2):67 (abstract THC.48), June 16-21, 1991.

  3. admin says:

    In <31366217.6…@nih.gov> Greg Folkers <folk…@nih.gov> writes:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    >Steven B. Harris/Virginia George wrote:

    >> In <4g5d9l$…@maureen.teleport.com> BKLBKL…@aol.com (BKL) writes:

    >> >"IV Drug Use Compromises Integrity of Cell Membranes Prior to HIV
    >> >Infection"
    >> >Reuters (02/14/96)
    >> >     Researchers in Switzerland have reported that intravenous drug
    >> >use "compromises the biochemical and structural integrity of the
    >> >membrane surface" of blood cells even before HIV infection.  The
    >> >researchers studied the blood cells of 101 injection drug users,
    >> >including 91 who were HIV-positive, as well as the blood of a
    >> >control group HIV-negative IV drug users.  The scientists found
    >> >that both groups had abnormal surface enzyme kinetics in their
    >> >peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

    >>   There is epidemiologic evidence that IV drug use (though not other
    >> kinds of drug use) is a cofactor for development of AIDS in HIV
    >> positive people.  There is no evidence that HIV-negative people are
    >> immunocompromised in an AIDS-type fashion by IV drug use, and
    >> considerable evidence against the notion.

    >>                                           Steve Harris, M.D.

    >Steve,

    >I’d be curious to know more about studies that suggest that injection
    >drug use speeds disease progression in HIV+ folks.

    Two suggestive references are my 57 and 58: AIDS: 8:339-386, 1994, and
    Br. Med. J. 301:1362-5,1990.

    >Most of the literature I have read suggests otherwise.  See, for

    example

    >Galli M et ak.  No evidence for a role of continuous intravenous drug
    >injection in accelerating disease progression in HIV-1 positive
    subjects.
    >IntConf AIDS; 7(2):67 (abstract THC.48), June 16-21, 1991.

    I dunno– I think the issue is still controversial.  Have any other
    references for this point of view?

                                        Steve

  4. admin says:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

    > >>   There is epidemiologic evidence that IV drug use (though not other
    > >> kinds of drug use) is a cofactor for development of AIDS in HIV
    > >> positive people.  There is no evidence that HIV-negative people are
    > >> immunocompromised in an AIDS-type fashion by IV drug use, and
    > >> considerable evidence against the notion.

    > >>                                           Steve Harris, M.D.

    > >Steve,

    > >I’d be curious to know more about studies that suggest that injection
    > >drug use speeds disease progression in HIV+ folks.

    > Two suggestive references are my 57 and 58: AIDS: 8:339-386, 1994, and
    > Br. Med. J. 301:1362-5,1990.

    > >Most of the literature I have read suggests otherwise.  See, for
    > example

    > >Galli M et ak.  No evidence for a role of continuous intravenous drug
    > >injection in accelerating disease progression in HIV-1 positive
    > subjects.
    > >IntConf AIDS; 7(2):67 (abstract THC.48), June 16-21, 1991.

    > I dunno– I think the issue is still controversial.  Have any other
    > references for this point of view?

    >                                     Steve

    Steve, here are some papers I have in my file that suggest that
    injection drug use does not hasten CD4+ T cell loss, and/or that
    injection drug users have rates of disease progression similar to other
    HIV-infected people.  I concur that the jury is probably still out on the
    issue.

    Of course injection drug use has many other deleterious effects,
    including a dimunition of NK cell activity, and should be avoided.  But
    to echo your post, there is NO EVIDENCE that injection drug use causes,
    in HIV-seronegative people — the specific immunologic profile of AIDS —
    progressive and persistent reductions in CD4+ T cells and profound
    deficits in cell-mediated immunity.  Progressive and persistent are the
    operative words here.

    GREG

    Galli, Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1989; 50: S166-76
    Margolick, JAMA 1992; 267(12_1631-66
    Margolick, Arch Intern Med 1994; 154(8):869-75
    Montella, JAMA 1992; 268(18):2516-7.
    Alcabes, Ann Epidem 1994; 4(1):17-26
    Alcabes, Am J Epidem 1993; 137(9):989-1000
    Italian Serovcenversion Study AIDS 1992; 6(4):421-26.
    Galai  J Acquir Immune Def Syndr 1995; 8:66-74
    Selwyn N Engl J Med 1992; 327(4):1697-7-3.
    Munoz, J Acquir Immune Def Syndr 1992; 5(7):694-700
    MAP Workshop.  Stat Med 1993; 12(22):2065-85
    Pezzoti J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1992; 5(7):745-7.
    Rezza Eur J Epidem 1990; 6(1):99-101.

  5. admin says:

    You will study your self into an early grave with all this useless
    writing.  AIDS has been and is curable with a few changes in
    lifestyle, namely no drugs and a raw food diet and plenty of
    exercise.  There is an obsession with "studies" that are totally
    irrelevant to anything and all that does is cover up the truth.  
    The medical community is obsessed with selling drugs.  Drugs and
    money.  No sickness, no work.  If anyone wants to cure themselves
    of AID OR ANYTHING ELSE STOP THE CAUSES.  Remember cause and
    effect — there are no pill cures.

    Hank

  6. admin says:

     You will study your self into an early grave with all this useless
    writing.  AIDS has been and is curable with a few changes in
    lifestyle, namely no drugs and a raw food diet and plenty of
    exercise.  There is an obsession with "studies" that are totally
    irrelevant to anything and all that does is cover up the truth.  
    The medical community is obsessed with selling drugs.  Drugs and
    money.  No sickness, no work.  If anyone wants to cure themselves
    of AID OR ANYTHING ELSE STOP THE CAUSES.  Remember cause and
    effect — there are no pill cures.

    Hank

Place your comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.