In 1992, the Lancet reported that for 66 true positives, there were 30,000
false positives.

And in pregnant women, “there were 8,000 false positives for 6
confirmations.” (Lancet. 339; 1992)

In Zimbabwe this year, the rate of HIV infection among young women
decreased remarkably, from 32.5 to 6 percent. A drop of  81% – overnight.
UNICEF’s Swaziland representative, Dr. Alan Brody, told the press

 “The problems is that all the sero-surveillance data came from pregnant
women, and estimates for other demographics was based on that.”

(PLUS News, August, 2004)
 
When these pregnant young women are tested, they’re often tested for other
illnesses, like syphilis, at the same time.

There’s no concern for cross-reactivity or false-positives in this group,
and no repeat testing.
One ELISA on one girl, and 32.5% of the population is suddenly HIV
positive.

The work of David Imagawa
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22david+imagawa%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Please send the 1992 report from the Lancet…
or at what uniform resource locator URL around the web
is that report?

Hemophilia.

Blood Safety and Supply
http://www.wfh.org/ShowDoc.asp?Rubrique=30&Document=319

“The amount of key antioxidants that many different species

maintain in their body is directly proportional to their lifespan.”

  Richard Cutler, M.D., Director of Anti-aging Research at

  the National Institutes of Health

Live Internet Broadcast of the #1 Business
Opportunity.

Find out how this company has monopolized the market with

scanner technology and how you can take advantage of it.

Tonight,   Jan 4, 2005   @  9:30 pm Eastern
Standard Time

(adjust for your time zone)

www.technoboomer.com

*** Think about China and how big that market is …

-     Ground Floor Opportunity

-     Backed by Billion Dollar Corporation

-     Scanner technology exclusive to our company
… monopolize it!

-     Huge Window of Opportunity

-     Why are you waiting?

And have you been Scanned?

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_6x_Talcum_Powder_and_…

       
Talcum Powder and Cancer
Talcum powder is produced from talc, a magnesium trisilicate mineral,
which in its natural form may contain asbestos, a known human carcinogen.
Because of this association with asbestos, all home-use talcum products
marketed after about 1973 – baby powders, body powders, facial powders –
have been required by law to be asbestos-free. Asbestos can cause lung
cancer and mesotheliomas (cancers affecting the lining surfaces of the
pleural and peritoneal cavities).

It has been suggested that talcum powder may be carcinogenic to the
covering layer of the ovaries through the migration of talcum powder
particles (applied to the genital area, sanitary napkins, diaphragms, or
condoms) through the vagina, uterus, and fallopian tubes to the ovary.
Several epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between
talcum powder and cancer of the ovary. Findings are mixed, with some
studies reporting a slightly increased risk and some reporting no
association. A case-control study published in 1997 of 313 women with
ovarian cancer and 422 without this disease found that the women with
cancer were more likely to have applied talcum powder to their external
genital area or to have used genital deodorant sprays. Women using these
products had a 50% to 90% higher risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Storing diaphragms with powder did not significantly increase cancer
risk.
Since many of these women might have used products with more asbestos
contamination than that in current products, the ovarian cancer risk for
current users is difficult to evaluate. Until additional information is
available, women may wish to consider avoiding these products or
substituting cornstarch-based powders that contain no talc. One study has
suggested that an increased risk, if it exists, might be confined to
borderline and endometrioid (uterine-like) tumors and therefore might not
affect the majority of ovarian cancers. Experimental toxicology studies
have suggested carcinogenicity of inhaled, asbestos-free talc powder in
some rodent species but not in others. The most recent publication on
this
topic, a prospective study (considered to generally be the most
informative) found no effect on ovarian cancer overall but a 40% increase
risk in one type — invasive serous cancers.

No increased risk of human lung cancer has been reported in association
with the use of cosmetic talcum powder. Although some studies of talc
miners and millers have suggested an increased risk of lung cancer and
other respiratory diseases, the industrial grade talc to which such
workers are exposed contains varying amounts of silica and asbestos,
unlike the purified talc sold to consumers. One study of pottery workers
exposed to silica dust and nonasbestiform talc showed an excess risk of
lung cancer, while other studies of occupational talc exposure have not
found an increased risk. While experimental evidence suggests that some
forms of silica may cause cancer in animals, observational studies in
humans are not conclusive.

REFERENCES

Cook LS, Kamb ML, Weiss NS. Perineal powder exposure and the risk of
ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145:459-465.

Gertrg DM, Hunter DJ, Cramer DW, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Willett WC,
Hankinson SE. Prospective study of talc use and ovarian cancer. J Natl
Cancer Inst; 2000: 92:249-252.

Harlow BL, Cramer DW, Bell DA, Welch WR. Perineal exposure to talc and
ovarian cancer risk. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 19-26.

Hartge P, Stewart PA. Occupation and ovarian cancer: a case-control study
in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1978-1981. J Occup Med 1994; 36
(8): 924-927.

Thomas TL, Stewart PA. Mortality from lung cancer and respiratory disease
among pottery workers exposed to silica and talc. Am J Epidemiol 1987;
125
(1): 35-43.

Revised: 02/03/2000

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/naziflu28dec04.shtml

The aids agent is more likely a mycoplasma

The Nazi Flu
  [Editor's Note: There is NO SUCH THING as an incurable disease or
undefeatable pathogenic organism (or pathogenic 'entity' such as prions),
including every 'weapons grade' bioengineered bug created by the satanic
globalists and their minions. Every substance in Nature and every organism
in the universe possesses a resonant frequency 'signature'. For readers
unfamiliar with the curative possibilities of electro-medicine, know that
exposing an organism to its resonant frequency will cause it to
self-destruct. It's a law of physics that can't be avoided or out-smarted by
the NWO plotters.

  Bear in mind that those of the Nazi mentality have historically and
regularly employed a psychological tactic of intimidation in which they
attempt to impress the public with an image of invincibility and unstoppable
prowess. If you've seen the news reels from Nazi Germany of the 1930's, you
know that Hitler used image promoters like Leni Rifenstahl, to project the
notion that the Nazi 'storm' troopers were impossible to resist. The use of
tactics and concepts like "Blitzkrieg" also was intended for psychological
intimidation. Remember Herr Rumsfeld's 'shock and awe' predictions prior to
the Iraq invasion? It turned out to be much more hype than reality (not that
the murderous bombardment that did take place can be minimized for its Iraqi
victims), but at the time, his statements projected an image of unstoppable
and overwhelming power for those naive enough to believe him. . Please
remember that the current crop of American Nazis are just as defeatable-in
every category of resistance- as their earlier incarnations of the 1930's.
Read the Daily Reports from Don Croft and the Adventures of Don & Carol
Croft if you want to see some first hand examples of how it's done...Ken ]

  By Dr. Leonard Horowitz
  http://educate-yourself.org/cn/naziflu28dec04.shtml
  December 28, 2004

  Forward courtesy of Stan Cayer <s…@opal-essence.com >

  The Case Of The Strange Cold Everybody Has Been Getting and Chemtrails-
and the Black Arts Nation….

  Fall 2004
  The Nazi Flu Interview With Dr. Leonard Horowitz

  Redden: I’d like to begin this interview by asking you about the flu. Many
of my friends are sick, and I’ve read a number of news stories which say
that people are sick around the world. So many people are sick that hospital
emergency rooms are swamped and doctors are postponing surgeries. But at the
  same time, the mainstream media is not referring to this outbreak as an
epidemic. So let me ask you, is there a flu epidemic underway or not?

  Horowitz: There has been for quite some time, but the authorities are
suppressing the news about it. It’s only been recently that the mainstream
media has acknowledged that hospital emergency rooms are filled with
patients with this bizarre upper respiratory infection that doesn’t quite
seem to be a virus, a flu that the flu vaccines were ineffective against,
that was a surprise and a complete mystery to the Centers for Disease
Control authorities.

  That’s all hogwash, bogus nonsense. The fact of the matter is, we have
seen this type of an epidemic since the end of 1998 and the beginning of
1999. People have been hacking and coughing with this bizarre illness that
does not seem to follow any logical viral or bacterial onset and transition
period. It was
  something that did not cause a high fever.

  If it was a bacterial or viral infection, it would have caused a fever in
these people. It didn’t. It was something that lasted weeks, if not months.
They had sinus congestion, sinus drainage, they had a cough, they had
fatigue, general malaise, they felt they were not quite right.

  Redden: Then is it fair to call this the flu, or is it something else?

  Horowitz: I think it’s only fair to call it flu-like. It is pathognomonic
of, not a bacterial or viral infection, it is pathognomonic of a fungus or a
fungus related to a flu. And that’s exactly what has been developed and
patented by the Armed Forces Research Institute of Pathology.

  We’ve reprinted the patent report in the new book, Healing Codes for the
Biological Apocalypse. We show you the report on the "pathogenic
mycoplasma." That’s a quote, "pathogenic mycoplasma." And if you know
anything about mycoplasmas, myco indicates fungal, but yet mycoplasma is not
really a fungus, it’s not really a bacteria, it’s not really a virus. It’s
sort of like a pseudo all of them. It has no cell wall, it goes deep into
the cell nuclei thereby making it very difficult to mount an immune response
against.

  Redden: And it’s man-made…

  Horowitz: It’s man-made. It can be used as a biological weapon. It was
developed as an AIDS vaccine-related organism. It was extracted from AIDS
patients. It is responsible for virtually all of the symptoms which AIDS
patients suffer from. The AIDS virus is at best a co-factor, and not even
such a strong co-factor as to bring on all of the symptoms of AIDS.

  This particular organism, the micoplasma, is associated with this upper
respiratory flu-like illness. And it’s also associated in its pathogenic
process with a whole variety of other symptoms that mimic AIDS.

  Redden: And that’s what you think is causing this epidemic?

  Horowitz: That’s only one of the factors. The patent report lays it out.
Like how you can use a factor like that to cause chronic upper respiratory
infections just like what is going on. I mean, virtually identical to what’s
going on. It’s patented by the Armed Forces Research Institute of Pathology.

  Redden: How did it get out of the lab and into the general population?

  Horowitz: There’s only speculation and the most likely thesis that I’m
looking at is through contaminated vaccines, contaminated blood supplies. I
don’t know any other suitable mode of transmitting that kind of infectious
agent.

  Redden: What about the current controversy over chemtrails – the theory
that airplanes are spraying the population with some kind of chemical or
biological weapon. As I understand it, a number of researchers believe that
many of the contrails in the skies these days are not the normal contrails
formed by high-flying jets, but are actually trails of chemical or
biological agents which spread out and then fall on the earth. Could this
mycoplasma be
  transmitted to the population through chemtrails?

  Horowitz: I don’t relate it to the chemtrails. I don’t believe that this
particular organism could be suitably spread that way. But I believe the
chemtrails are responsible for a chemical intoxication of the public, which
would then cause a general immune suppression, low grade to high grade,
depending on
  exposure. An immune dysfunction, which would then allow people to become
susceptible to opportunistic infections, such as this micoplasma and other
opportunistic infections.

  Redden: So you believe that high-flying planes are, in fact, spraying
something on the population that the theory is real?

  Horowitz: There’s no question that it’s real. There’s no doubt about that.
I first began to investigate chemtrails when some were sprayed over my home
in Northern Idaho. I took pictures of them, and then contacted the
Environmental Protection Agency of the state. When I contacted their
directors, they
  were clueless and referred me to the Air Force.

  They then got me in touch with Centers for Disease Control Toxicology, and
after about a week I received a letter from one of their chief toxicologists
saying, indeed there was some amount of ethylene dibromide in the jet fuel.
Now, ethylene dibromide is a known human chemical carcinogen that was
  removed from unleaded gasoline because of its cancer-causing effects. Now
suddenly it has appeared in the jet fuel that apparently high-altitude
military aircraft are emitting.

  Redden: Why has ethylene dibromide been added to jet fuel?

  Horowitz: When you examine who owns the fuel, who are the fuel company
directors, suddenly you enter into the realm of the Rockefeller family and
the royal families, Standard Oil and British Petroleum. And what are their
other agendas? Suddenly now you see their documents, showing that they have
funded, historically, eugenics, racial hygiene, genocide, depopulation,
family planning, maternal and child health where they make and deliver
vaccines, and contaminated blood supplies.

  These are the banksters, the same people who run the blood banking as well
as the money banking industries. In both Emerging Viruses and Healing Codes,
I reference a great book by Dr. John Coleman, who worked as a British Secret
Service agent at the highest levels. And he articulated very clearly who was
running those companies.

  It all goes back, ultimately, to the highest level of the royal family.
The Bush family, Rothschild family, the Rockefeller money, and the entire
Rockefeller establishment is based on Rothschild money and royal families.
So you begin to then, at least, put forward a possible theory, that if you
can’t explain
  it rationally and any other way, I think you’ve got to begin to consider
conspiracy theories. And once you eliminate the negative label that you’ve
placed on conspiracy theories per se, because that’s been demonized, as has
the terms holistic medicine, holistic health.

  Redden: Naturopathic

  Horowitz: Naturopathy. I mean these labels get placed and as soon as they
do, you know, it begins to wave red flags and people avoid those things.
But, you know, when you really just define a conspiracy as is defined in
Websters, as two or more people getting together behind closed doors
covertly and planning something unethical, immoral, illegal and then
carrying it out, that’s a conspiracy. So that’s now what you’re looking at,
at the highest levels.

  You’re looking at decision-makers who have, for whatever reasons, decided
to put this toxic waste into jet fuels for human exposure, what ultimately’s
going to be human exposure. And it just so happens that these same people
have put a lot of money into reducing world populations. So now you ask your
self, when it comes to testing human subjects like American citizens
unwittingly, unwillingly, who sprays toxins out of airplanes over San
Francisco, kills people that way, who sprays biologicals on the Pennsylvania
turnpike that induce death?

  Who has done that historically, as clearly articulated in the Frank Church
congressional hearings of 1975, has been Central Intelligence Agency
biological weapons contracting firms, such as Litton Bionetics, such as the
Army Corp of Engineers when they were developing and utilizing these various
biologicals. And this is all done under black operations, covert operations,
where they get funding and congressional people are never informed really
where this money is going. It’s the black budget.

  Redden: As I understand it, this is not just an American epidemic, but
it’s gone across Europe.

  Horowitz: That’s right. And so have the chemtrails. I’ve got colleagues
over there, I’ve got colleagues in the Bahamas, Bermuda, Toronto, British
Columbia all reporting the same bizarre seeding of the atmosphere. It’s
horrible. What is going on is just despicable.

  Redden: One reason I’m interested in this subject is, I personally know
three people who had the exact same thing happen to them. First they came
down with flu-like symptoms which didn’t go away. Then they went to the
doctor, and the doctor said their flu had developed into a bacterial
infection and we can give you antibiotics for that. Then they were all given
a brand new antibiotic they had never taken before, and they all had serious
allergic reactions.

  Horowitz: Right. Isn’t that fascinating?

  Redden: What happened to them?

  Horowitz: OK, that’s a great question. I’m glad you asked that because I
should have mentioned it before. What you’re looking at with this upper
respiratory infection is that it is a multi-factorial illness. It’s
associated with a variety of chemical and biological co-factors. Just like
with AIDS, it’s not the AIDS virus that ultimately kills, it’s co-factor
microbes such as the Mycoplasma. What you have could be described as an
ideal Russian biological cocktail. And I suppose it’s called Russia
biological cocktail because the Americans likely invented it.

  What they determined would be the best biological chemical warfare
approach was a combination of chemicals and biologicals, so that it would be
very difficult to diagnose and then treat the illnesses. Moreover, it would
be very difficult to trace where they came from. If you’ve got, say,
ethylene dibromide coming out of the jet fuels that is causing immune
suppression and weakening your immune system, and then you’ve got a
mycoplasma microbe or a fungus that causes an upper respiratory illness,
suddenly you develop a secondary bacterial infection.

  Now you get hit with antibiotics, and the antibiotics cause your body
chemistry to go acidic, so now you get rashes and other things, your liver
gets full of toxins and comes out through your skin in rashes and they get
hyperallergenic reactions associated with the other chemicals. So all of a
sudden now, you realize that you’ve got a human being who is completely out
of balance and infected by two, three or four microbial co-factors as well
as intoxicated by a variety of different chemicals.

  Redden: A point of clarification. Are You saying that the fungus is
working with the chemtrails and the antibiotic to make people sick?

  Horowitz: Exactly. And you’ve got somebody who’s going to be chronically
ill. And in the contemporary warfare arena, where experts in biological
chemical warfare convene and discuss the ways that are ideal to conduct
warfare today, to really take an enemy out, you don’t want to kill the
people. You want to produce people who are chronically ill and become
dependent on the state and totally sap the resources of the country.

  And then you can move in further with your military-medical-industrial
complex, your international medical-pharmaceutical cartel. And then you sell
these beleaguered and defeated countries all of the pharmaceuticals and
chemicals that they need to maintain any semblance of healthy function.

  Redden: So you’ve got a work force that can work, but they’re too tired
after they finish working to…

  Horowitz: That’s exactly it. They’re completely depleted. They can’t put
together a military; you create a dependence and thereby you weaken the
population, and weakened populations are easy to control. So you’ve got
population control, and you make vast fortunes doing it, versus just blowing
up a nuclear weapon and devastating the infrastructure that you own. You and
your colleagues own that infrastructure. You want to get rid of the people.
You don’t want to get rid of infrastructure.

  What I’m relating to you now is not speculation. If you were to read the
top experts analysis of military warfare, such as what is articulated in The
Report From Iron Mountain, which even the authorities, they say that this is
a hoax, a satire, but, you know, there’s nothing funny about it. The
propaganda, the spin that they put on it is that the document is a satire.
But when you read it, there’s nothing funny about it.

  Redden: You mentioned the Rockefellers. You think the Rockefeller family
is one of the major players in this conspiracy?

  Horowitz: Oh, absolutely. One of the major players in world genocide,
world population reduction. That’s no mystery anymore. I mean, you even have
some mainstream publishing companies, such as St. Martin’s Press, writing
the most horrific exposes of the Rockefeller family. You have Oxford
University Press, publishing, for example, Christopher Simpson’s work,
called The Science of Coercion, where he proves that virtually the entire
scientific and particularly health science agenda was laid out by the
Rockefeller family.

  In the 1920′s, the federal government was giving very little money for
public health. Where the huge investment in public health in the United
States came from was the Rockefeller financial coffers, you know. They were
behind it all. And so, already by the 30′s, the early 1930′s, who was
responsible for the primary viral research investments, public health
looking at cancer, who created the cancer industry in the 1920′s, was the
Rockefellers, all the Rockefeller money.

  And if you didn’t go along with that particular money making population
controlling agenda as a health scientist or health professional you were
traditionally demoted, defunded, ostracized. And then if you kept it up, you
were persecuted and then jailed. I know many, many people who have gone
through
  that.

MASCULINITY AT RISK

Sperm counts in healthy men around the world have fallen about 50 percent
in the last 50 years.

Detailed studies of how sperm counts have changes over time in a
particular area show the same pattern, with a few exceptions.

Researchers hypothesize that exposure to toxic

chemicals may be an important cause of the decline.
In laboratory tests, researchers exposed pregnant or nursing mother rats
to certain chemicals found in pesticide products (also used in condom
manufacture in large quantities).

This exposure disrupted the hormonal balance in their male offspring and
limited the development of their sperm~producing cells, resulting in
permanently reduced sperm courts.

http://www.eap.mcgill.ca/MagRack/JPR/JPR_28.htm

____________

Infertility in Men linked to condoms

September 2001
WHAT IS MALE INFERTILITY?

Infertility is the failure of a couple to become pregnant after one year
of regular, unprotected intercourse. In both men and women the fertility
process is complex, and, in many cases, infertility is caused by a
combination of problems in both partners that conspire to prevent
conception.

About 10% to 15% of couples experience some form of infertility, and, in
approximately 40% of these cases, male infertility is the major factor.
Another 40% of infertility problems are caused by abnormalities of the
woman’s reproductive system, and the remaining 20% involve couples who
both suffer reproductive difficulties.
Infertility affects one in 25 American men. More than 90% of male
infertility cases are due to low sperm counts, poor sperm quality, or
both. Whether sperm counts are declining overall in industrialized
countries is a controversial issue. [ See Box Declining Male Fertility?]
Declining Male Fertility?

Although there have been reports of declining male fertility in the US and
in Europe, several recent studies have not found a drop in sperm counts
over the past 50 years. A large 2000 study based in Los Angeles, for
example, found virtually no change in sperm count from a study conducted
in the 1950s. Similarly, a Danish study showed no change in sperm quality
in men born between 1950 and 1970.

Some experts suggest that the decline observed in other studies may not
have taken into consideration normal sperm fluctuations that can occur
from year to year and from season to season. Sperm counts also appear to
differ by region.

Temperature and climate, then, may play some role in the differences seen
from country to country and from year to year. In one study, Finland had
the highest measured sperm count in the world, while Britain’s was low.
(It should be noted that a more recent study has reported a significant
decline in sperm count in Finnish men between 1981 and 1991.) In another
study, the sperm count in New York City was much higher than that in Los
Angeles.

Note: Many studies are limited, and most rely on data from sperm banks,
which also may not reflect the male population as a whole.

CAUSES
Environmental Assaults
Over exposure to environmental assaults (toxins, chemicals, infections)
can reduce sperm count either by direct effects on testicular function or
on the hormone systems, although the extent of the effect and specific
environmental assaults involved are often controversial.

Exposure to Chemicals. In most cases, avoiding toxic environments can
restore sperm count.

*       Pesticides with estrogen-like effects have the strongest evidence for
sperm reduction. Overexposure to estrogen reduces the number of Sertoli
cells (the cells necessary for the initial development of sperm).
Such pesticides include DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, PCPs, dioxins, and furans.
One 1999 study of couples in a fertility clinic reported that when men had
a history of moderate or high on-the-job exposure to pesticides their
fertility rates were lower than men without such exposures. Although tests
of single chemicals containing estrogen have reported little dangers,
other studies indicate that exposure to more than one of these chemicals
may be very harmful.
*       Phthalates are chemicals used to soften plastics. Most are harmless, but
the most commonly-used one, called DEHP, may warrant concern, animals
exposed to DEHP had lower than normal sperm counts. In addition, there is
some concern that exposure in pregnant women may affect their children.

*       Other chemicals are under investigation. In one 2000 study, workers in a
rubber factory who were chronically exposed to hydrocarbons (ethylbenzene,
*benzene, *toluene, and *xylene) had lower than average sperm count and
sperm qualities.

Another 1999 study suggested that men whose work exposes them to aromatic
solvents used in paints, varnishes, glues, and metal degreasers and other
products may be at risk of reduced fertility.

In addition to the effect on fertility, some researchers believe
overexposure to chemicals may also contribute to testicular cancers. In
fact, a 2000 study concluded that there was a link between sperm
abnormalities and testicular cancer.

Among the study participants, men in couples with fertility problems were
more likely to develop testicular cancer. In addition, low semen
concentration, poor sperm motility, and abnormal sperm morphology were all
associated with increased risk for testicular cancer.

* (benzene, *toluene) Used in condom manufacture

A.A.S.Q.A

"If you are a new visitor please enter the Main Website above first, as
this page will only have meaning if you fully understand what
GlaxoSmithKline has done and is doing to us all."

http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page01.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page02.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page03.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page04.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page05.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page06.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page07.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page08.htm
http://www.aasqa.info/glaxo-stuff-page09.htm